Research Interests:

Below are brief descriptions of some of the research areas I am interested in.

Hybrid Inverse Problems.

Optical tomography (see below) and Electrical Impedance Tomography are useful modalities thanks to the large contrast often observed between the optical and electrical properties of healthy and non-healthy tissues. However, because of multiple scattering, these are low-resolution modalities.
Ultrasound tomography enjoys high resolution capabilities. However, because sound speeds vary little between healthy and non-healthy tissues, it is low-contrast.
One way to combine large contrast and high resolution is to use the photo-acoustic effect: as (near-infra-red or electromagnetic) radiation propagates through a medium of interest, partial absorption causes thermal expansion and the generation of ultrasound. Such ultrasonic waves propagate to the domain's boundary where they are measured. See the Wikipedia web page. The amount of absorbed radiation is first reconstructed by solving an inverse wave source problem. Next comes the problem of Quantitative Photo-Acoustic Tomography (QPAT) where the optical parameters are reconstructed from knowledge of the absorbed radiation map.

Mathematically, these inverse problems involve parameter reconstructions from knowledge of Internal Functionals. Such inverse problems are often referred to as Hybrid Inverse Problems, or alternatively Coupled-Physics Inverse Problems or Multi-Waves Inverse Problems.

For recent results on QPAT and the related quantitative Thermo-acoustic Tomography (QTAT), see the papers Inverse Diffusion Theory of Photoacoustics (with G. Uhlmann), Inverse Problems, 26(8), 085010, 2010; Inverse Transport Theory of Photoacoustics (with A. Jollivet and V. Jugnon), Inverse Problems, 26, 025011, 2010; On Multi-spectral quantitative photoacoustic tomography (with K. Ren), Inverse Problems, 27(7), 075003, 2011; Quantitative Thermo-acoustics and related problems (with K. Ren, G. Uhlmann and T. Zhou), Inverse Problems 27(5), 055007, 2011; as well as Multiple-source quantitative photoacoustic tomography (with K. Ren), Inverse Problems 28(1), 025010, 2012.

More generally, QPAT, QTAT, as well as the elasticity-based modalities Transient Elastography (TE) and Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) all involve reconstructions of parameters in the elliptic equation \[\nabla\cdot a\nabla u+b\cdot\nabla u+cu=0\] from knowledge of internal functionals of the form \[H(x)=u(x) \quad \mbox{ or } \quad H(x) = \Gamma(x) u(x) \] for some typically unknown function \(\Gamma(x)\). The analysis of what can and cannot be reconstructed in the possibly complex-valued \((a,b,c)\) for \(a\) possibly tensor-valued from knowledge of functionals of the form \(H(x)\) is analyzed in Reconstruction of coefficients in scalar second-order elliptic equations from knowledge of their solutions (with G. Uhlmann), arXiv:1111.5051.

Another hybrid imaging methodology is Ultrasound Modulated Optical Tomography, also called acousto-optics. In this setting, acoustic waves are emitted to change the index of refraction and the spatial density of the absorbers and scatterers. Light propagating through the medium is influenced by these changes and provides local information about the optical parameters. See the model described in Inverse Scattering and Acousto-Optic Imaging (with J.C. Schotland), Phys. Rev. Letters, 104, 043902, 2010. Mathematically, these inverse problems correspond to solving 0-Laplacians from possibly redundant power density measurements of the form \[H_{ij}(x)=\gamma(x) \nabla u_i(x)\cdot\nabla u_j(x)\] for \(u_i(x)\) solution of the elliptic equation \(\nabla\cdot \gamma\nabla u_i=0\) with appropriate conditions \(u_i=g_i\) at the boundary of the domain of interest. Because the direction of \(\nabla u_j\) is not available in such measurements, the analysis of such hybrid inverse problems is significantly more complex than for functionals of the form \(H(x) = \Gamma(x) u(x)\).

Recent results on the problem are reported in Cauchy problem for Ultrasound Modulated EIT , To Appear in Analysis and PDE; Inverse diffusion from knowledge of power densities (with E. Bonnetier, F. Monard and F. Triki), submitted; and Inverse diffusion problem with redundant internal information (with F. Monard), submitted. The reconstruction of an anisotropic diffusion tensor \(\gamma\) from such functionals was recently analyzed in two space dimensions in Inverse anisotropic diffusion from power density measurements in two dimensions (with F. Monard), submitted.

A recent review paper on Hybrid Inverse Problems is available at Hybrid inverse problems and internal information (review paper), to appear in Inside-Out, Cambridge University Press, 2012 (G. Uhlmann editor).

The Calderón Prize lecture given during
AIP 2011 at Texas A& M is available at Inverse Problems with Internal Functionals. From Calderón's problem to Hybrid Inverse Problems .

Limiting models for Equations with stochastic coefficients.

Many results of homogenization for equations with random coefficients have been obtained over the past decades. In such theories, random solutions are shown to be accurately approximated by deterministic, effective medium solutions. Of considerable interest in many applications, including in solving inverse problems and/or parameter estimation problem, is the characterization of the random fluctuations in the solution. Such a characterization is understood in an extremely limited number of cases.

What the random fluctuations look like and what they depend upon is analyzed in a series of papers Central limits and homogenization in random media, (long version with more detailed proofs arXiv:0710.0363 ), Multiscale Model. Simul., 7(2), pp. 677-702, 2008; Random integrals and correctors in homogenization (with J. Garnier, S. Motsch, and V. Perrier), Asymptotic Analysis, 59(1-2), pp. 1-26, 2008; Corrector theory for elliptic equations in random media with singular Green's function. Application to random boundaries (with W. Jing), Comm. Math. Sci., 9(2), pp. 383-411, 2011; Corrector Theory for Elliptic Equations with Long-range Correlated Random Potential (with J. Garnier, W. Jing, and Y. Gu), to appear in Asymptotic Analysis.

These papers show that the size of the random fluctuations of the elliptic solution strongly depend on whether the random parameters are short-range or long-range. The random fluctuations also need not be asymptotically Gaussian as is shown in Random Homogenization and Convergence to Integrals with respect to the Rosenblatt Process (with Y. Gu), submitted.

Consider the parabolic Anderson model \[ \partial_t u_\varepsilon + (-\Delta)^{\frac m2} u_\varepsilon + \frac{1}{\varepsilon^\alpha}q(\frac x\varepsilon) u_\varepsilon =0\] for \(\alpha\) chosen so that the large but rapidly oscillating (Gaussian) potential \( q \) has a strong influence on \(u_\varepsilon\). Then the behavior of \(u_\varepsilon\) as \(\varepsilon\to0\) depends on spatial dimension.
In dimensions \(d\geq m\), we obtain in the limit a homogenized, deterministic equation as is shown in: Homogenization with large spatial random potential, Multiscale Model. Simul., 8, pp. 1484-1510, 2010.
In smaller dimensions \(d < m\), the solution to the equation with heterogeneous coefficients does not converge to a deterministic equation but rather to a stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) with multiplicative noise as is shown in: Convergence to SPDEs in Stratonovich form, Comm. Math. Phys., 212(2), pp. 457-477, 2009.
The generalization to long-range, possibly time-dependent, potentials is analyzed in: Convergence to Homogenized or Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Appl Math Res Express, 2011(2), pp. 215-241, 2011.

There are several applications to the macroscopic modeling of the random fluctuations of PDE solutions. One such application is the derivation of physics-based noise models in Inverse Problems; see below.
An other application pertains to the testing of numerical multi-scale algorithms. We can then ask ourselves whether in a well-understood environment, the random fluctuations generated by the algorithm are accurate discretizations of the random fluctuations of the continuous model; see Corrector theory for MsFEM and HMM in random media (with W. Jing), Multiscale Model. Simul., 9, pp. 1549-1587, 2011, for an analysis in the (already technically challenging) one-dimensional setting.

Kinetic Models and Imaging.

As waves propagate through heterogeneous media, they scatter and their energy may change direction. An accurate macroscopic description of such phenomena is obtained by using kinetic models to represent the energy density of the propagating waves. Kinetic models more generally may be used to track the correlation of two wave fields propagating in possibly different heterogeneous media. Here is the paper Kinetics of scalar wave fields in random media on the subject. Kinetic models have also been validated numerically (with Olivier Pinaud) in Accuracy of transport models for waves in random media. In statistically stable random media, i.e., in media in which the energy density can be shown to depend weakly on the specific realization of the random media, the kinetic models may be used to detect and image buried inclusions in a cluttered environment. I refer, e.g., to the paper Self-averaging in time reversal for the parabolic wave equation (written with George Papanicolaou and Lenya Ryzhik) for work on the statistical stability of waves in random media. [Note that waves are not always stable as was shown in the paper: On the self-averaging of wave energy in random media.] References on Imaging in random media using kinetic models may be found in a series of papers: Kinetic Models for Imaging in Random Media (with Olivier Pinaud) and Transport-based imaging in random media (with Kui Ren). Results on kinetic-based reconstructions from experimental data (collected in Larry Carin's group at Duke University) may be found Experimental validation of a transport-based imaging method in highly scattering environments (written with Larry Carin, Dehong Liu, and Kui Ren).

Time Reversal.

Theoretical understanding. Time reversal consists of understanding why time-reversed waves propagating in highly heterogeneous media refocus much more tightly at their original location than when they propagate in a homogeneous medium. A numerical simulation demonstrating the effects of time reversed wave pulses propagating in random media can be seen on this web page. The reason for the very good refocusing observed in heterogeneous media and absent in homogeneous media is multiple scattering. Multiple interactions of waves with the underlying structure can be modeled in several ways. Radiative transfer models are multi-dimensional models that accounts very well for the spatial multiple scattering observed in physical experiments. Our quantitative analysis of time reversal refocusing can be found in the paper: Time Reversal and refocusing in Random Media.

Changing media. In many practical applications, the media during the forward and backward stages of the time reversal experiment may slightly (at best) differ. We have shown in the paper Time Reversal in Changing Environment, how the refocusing of the time reversed signal is affected by changes in the underlying media. How much can media change before time reversed waves lose their enhanced refocusing properties? Our answer is: very little. A mathematical analysis in the simplified setting of paraxial approximations may be found in the following paper with L. Ryzhik: Stability of time reversed waves in changing media.

Detection and Imaging. Several studies have recently been conducted to understand how the refocusing properties of time reversed waves may be used in detection and imaging in heterogeneous media. Unless the underlying propagating media is known (or the available approximation correlates very closely with the exact media, which is seldom the case in applications) time reversal and imaging live in different worlds. In the former, the time reversed signal back-propagates through the real physical media whereas in the latter, its propagation must be simulated on the computer, whence in a very different manner. In a recent paper with Olivier Pinaud, Time reversal based detection in random media, we show that time reversal may still be used in detection and imaging in highly heterogeneous media provided that the underlying media is known statistically (which is much easier to get than full knowledge) and statistically stable, which is arguably the main hindrance to successful detection and imaging in heterogeneous media. Reconstructions based on experimental data (collected by Larry Carin's group at Duke University) may be found in Electromagnetic Time-Reversal Imaging in Changing Media: Experiment and Analysis.

Links to Talks and Lecture Notes

Here is a link to the presentation (20Mb file with movies) given at the AIP 2007 in Vancouver in the summer of 2007.

Here is a two-hour talk given at the end of a course on "Waves in Random Media", two tutorial lectures ( Lecture 1; Lecture 2) given in September of 2005 at the CIRM, Luminy, France, and a fairly long presentation given in the fall of 2003 at IPAM, on wave propagation in random media and time reversal.

Here is a link to Lecture Notes for a course on waves in random media given at Columbia in the fall of 2005.

Inverse Transport Theory.

Transport equations are ubiquitous in medical and geophysical imaging. Scattering-free transport equations model high-energy particles propagating through human tissues, as in X-Ray Tomography. Lower frequency (near-infra-red) photons as used in Optical Tomography are modeled by transport equations with large scattering coefficients.

Inverse transport theories strongly depend on the amount of scattering in the forward transport equation. In highly scattering environments, inverse transport is replaced by inverse diffusion problems, which are well-studied. In the absence of scattering, inverse transport is an integral geometry problem, which is also well understood. Inverse transport bridges the gap between the two regimes. See the paper Inverse Transport Theory and applications (review paper), Inverse Problems, 25, 055006, 2009, for a review of recent results obtained in inverse transport theory.

A major difficulty in inverse transport theory is to understand which optical properties of the underlying medium may be stably reconstructed. This crucially depends on the source (isotropic versus angularly resolved) and on the measurements (time dependent or not, angularly resolved or angularly averaged). Here is a sequence of recent papers on this topic. Time-dependent angularly averaged inverse transport (with A. Jollivet), Inverse Problems, 25, 075010, 2009. (long version with additional proofs and results arXiv:0902.3432 ) ; Approximate stability in inverse transport (with A. Jollivet), in Biomedical Mathematics, Ed. Y. Censor, M. Jiang, G. Wang, Medical Physics Publishing, Wisconsin, 2010; Stability for time dependent inverse transport (with A. Jollivet), SIAM J. Math. Anal., 42(2), pp. 679-700, 2010; Inverse transport with isotropic sources and angularly averaged measurements , (with I. Langmore and F. Monard), Inverse Probl. Imaging, 2(1), pp. 23-42, 2008

Here is a sequence of three talks ( Lecture 1, Lecture 2, Lecture 3) given on the subject at the University of Washington during the Summer School organized in August 2005 by Gunther Uhlmann.

Ray transforms and X-Ray Tomography.

X-Ray tomography (or computerized tomography) is ubiquitous in medical imaging. Not surprisingly, it uses X-ray beams, composed of highly-energetic photons. The image reconstruction from X-ray measurements is based on the Radon transform; see the books by Frank Natterer on the subject.

SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed [or Computerized] Tomography) is an inverse source problem. One is interested in reconstructing the spatial distribution of a source of radiation from boundary measurements. Mathematically, because the photons are absorbed by human tissues before they can be measured, one has to invert an attenuated Radon transform . Exact inversion formulas have only obtained very recently and independently by A.L. Bukhgeim and collaborators using the technique of A-analytic functions and by R.G. Novikov using techniques borrowed from inverse scattering. I have worked on extension of the latter work for more general source terms (with applications in Doppler tomography for instance) and for incomplete angular measurements. See the following paper On the attenuated Radon transform with full and partial measurements. An extension to scattering problems may be found in the joint paper with A. Tamasan: Inverse source problems in transport equations. One of the main advantages of explicit inversion formulas is that they allow us to construct fast inversion algorithms. With Philippe Moireau, we have generalized the Fast Slant Stack method to the inversion of the attenuated Radon transform with full or partial measurements. See the following paper: Fast numerical inversion of the attenuated Radon transform with full and partial measurements.

Ray transforms also appear in geophysical imaging. The main difference with respect to most imaging techniques is that rays are now curved. In the simplified (yet practically useful) case where the rays are the geodesics of a hyperbolic metric, I have extended the explicit formulas obtained in Euclidean geometry to the scalar and vectorial source problem in hyperbolic geometry; see the paper: Ray Transforms in Hyperbolic Geometry.

Ray transforms also find applications in the reconstruction of concentration profiles in the atmosphere. In the non-scattering framework, frequency-dependent radiation emitted by different gases may be measured by satellites. In the one-dimensional setting, there is only one ray (radiation moves up). The z-dependent concentration profiles may thus be reconstructed from the frequency dependency in the measurements. Unlike the ray transform problems mentioned above, the concentration profile reconstruction is a severely ill-posed problem (so that noise is severely amplified during the reconstruction process). With Kui Ren, we show this and provide methods to recover thin layers with sharp contrast (dust layers or ozone layers) in the following paper Atmospheric Concentration Profile Reconstructions from Radiation Measurements.

Here is a presentation I gave at IPAM in the fall of 2003 on SPECT problems.

Optical Tomography.

Optical tomography (OT) uses near infra red (NIR) photons to probe human tissues. NIR photons are very low energy and thus are quite harmless. The corollary of their low energy is that they scatter a lot with human tissues, which significantly reduces their use in medical imaging. Despite its relatively poor spatial resolution, OT has a however great advantage: it can image tissue properties (such as absorption) that other imaging techniques cannot do.

Motivated by works by S. Arridge, I have worked on the modeling of photon propagation in domains that are highly scattering everywhere except in small-volume non-scattering layers. The understanding of such domains is important if photons are to be used to image properties of the human head.
With Kui Ren, we have shown that a macroscopic (hence computationally cheap) generalized diffusion equation including singular interfaces could be used to model such a propagation; see Generalized diffusion model in optical tomography with clear layers . A theoretical and numerical analysis of such models can also be found in the papers Transport through diffusive and non-diffusive regions, embedded objects, and clear layers and Particle transport through scattering regions with clear layers and inclusions . Once the clear layers have been modeled by singular interfaces, it remains an interesting problem to understand whether they (and the other relevant physical parameters involved) can be reconstructed from boundary measurements. Some answers are provided in the paper Reconstructions in impedance and optical tomography with singular interfaces. The latter paper adapts to singular layers the factorization method developed by A. Kirsch .

Inverse Problems in OT are known to be extremely ill-posed, with an error in the reconstruction of the diffusion and absorption properties logarithmic in the error level on the measured data (in the sense that an accuracy of 10E-10 in the data may result in an accuracy of 1/10 in the reconstruction). Here is a way to somewhat overcome this stability constraint by using asymptotic expansions of small volume inclusions. Another promising approach to increase the amount of available data is to use time harmonic sources. The following paper in collaboration with with K. Ren and A. Hielscher deals with this issue: Frequency Domain Optical Tomography Based on the Equation of Radiative Transfer. In that paper, we show that increasing the source modulation frequency improves the reconstruction of the optial coefficients. Theoretical explanations based on careful stationary phase analyses can be found in the two papers: Angular average of time-harmonic transport solutions (with A.Jollivet, I.Langmore, and F.Monard) Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 36(6), pp. 1044-1070, 2011; and Inverse Transport with isotropic time harmonic sources (with F. Monard), SIAM J. Math. Anal., 2012.

Physical modeling of noise and random correctors in inverse problems.

Many problems are ill-posed. As a consequence, some part of a coefficient of interest (typically its high-frequency content) cannot be reconstructed. Since it is bound to remain unknown, this part may as well be modeled as random. This unknown part typically has an influence on the available data used to reconstruct the rest of the coefficient when the inverse problem is nonlinear. The ultimate resolution that one can attain for such an inverse problem very much depends on the stochastic structure of the noise in the data. In some cases, that stochastic structure may be characterized relatively accurately as a stochastic correction to homogenization. Its use provides ways to significantly reduce the variance (uncertainty) in the reconstructions. See Physics-based models for measurement correlations. Application to an inverse Sturm-Liouville problem (with K. Ren), Inverse Problems, 25, 053001, 2009.